ArchiCAD vs Revit

“ArchiCAD vs Revit: In-Depth Comparison of Features and Applications for BIM”

by ArchitectureArtEducationTechnologyUncategorized
Estimated Reading Time: 9 minutes

Summary
“ArchiCAD vs Revit: In-Depth Comparison of Features and Applications for BIM”

In this article, a comprehensive comparison between two prominent software in the field of architectural design and construction engineering, ArchiCAD and Revit, was conducted. Each of these software tools has its own unique features and capabilities that make them suitable for various types of projects. ArchiCAD, with its simpler user interface and freehand design capabilities, is a great choice for architects with less experience. On the other hand, Revit, with its advanced parametric modeling tools and ability to handle complex projects, is better suited for engineers and architects working on larger-scale projects.

Ultimately, the choice between these two software depends on the specific needs of the project and the user’s level of expertise. This article helps you make a better-informed decision when selecting the right software for your projects.

Author: Hamed Salimian
Here’s a suggested table of contents for your article on the comparison between ArchiCAD and Revit:

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
    • Overview of ArchiCAD and Revit
    • Importance of BIM Software in Architecture and Engineering
  2. History and Background
    • ArchiCAD: Origins and Development
    • Revit: Origins and Development
  3. User Interface Comparison
    • ArchiCAD Interface: Simplicity and Usability
    • Revit Interface: Complexity and Customization
  4. BIM Features and Capabilities
    • ArchiCAD’s BIM Tools
    • Revit’s BIM Tools
  5. Modeling and Design Features
    • ArchiCAD’s Design Flexibility
    • Revit’s Parametric Modeling
  6. Energy Simulation and Performance Analysis
    • ArchiCAD’s Energy Simulation Tools
    • Revit’s Energy Analysis Capabilities
  7. Collaboration and File Compatibility
    • ArchiCAD’s Compatibility with Other Software
    • Revit’s Integration with Autodesk Ecosystem
  8. Advantages and Disadvantages
    • ArchiCAD’s Strengths and Weaknesses
    • Revit’s Strengths and Weaknesses
  9. Use Case Scenarios
    • When to Choose ArchiCAD
    • When to Choose Revit
  10. Conclusion
    • Final Thoughts on Choosing Between ArchiCAD and Revit
  11. Author’s Note
    • A Brief About the Author: Hamed Salimian

Introduction

In the world of architectural design and construction engineering, there are numerous software tools for Building Information Modeling (BIM) that assist designers, architects, and engineers in streamlining the design and construction processes. Two prominent software in this field are ArchiCAD and Revit. Each of these software tools has its own unique features and capabilities, which can significantly impact the design and construction workflow of projects.

This article will provide an in-depth comparison between ArchiCAD and Revit. The comparison will be based on the features, capabilities, advantages, disadvantages, and applications of these software tools to help architects, engineers, and designers make the best choice for their specific needs.
History and Background of the Software

ArchiCAD
ArchiCAD, developed by Graphisoft, was first released in 1984 and has since become one of the most important architectural design software tools. Initially, the software was recognized as a tool for 2D and 3D design, but over time, it evolved into an advanced Building Information Modeling (BIM) software. As one of the pioneers of BIM, ArchiCAD provides powerful tools for architectural design, building information modeling, energy simulation, and the production of construction documentation.

Revit
Revit is another software in the field of Building Information Modeling, developed by Autodesk. First released in 2000, it quickly became one of the most widely used BIM software tools in the architecture, engineering, and construction industries. Revit is built on the concepts of “parameters” and “information modeling,” offering the ability to generate highly accurate and editable 3D models.
Feature Comparison

User Interface

ArchiCAD:
The user interface of ArchiCAD is simpler and more intuitive compared to Revit. This software is better suited for individuals who are looking for a user-friendly environment and a “drag-and-drop” design approach. The tools and windows in ArchiCAD are designed to be straightforward and easy to use.

Revit:
Revit’s user interface is relatively more complex. It allows users to utilize more advanced tools for designing and managing projects. While Revit may initially be confusing for beginners, over time, as users become more familiar with the software, they can fully benefit from its capabilities.

Modeling and BIM Features

ArchiCAD:
As one of the first BIM-based software tools, ArchiCAD offers powerful features for building modeling, documentation creation, energy simulation, and building information management. One of ArchiCAD’s standout features is the GDL (Geometric Description Language) tool, which allows designers to create custom objects and components that can be added to the BIM model.

Revit:
Revit is more widely used in larger and more complex projects due to its advanced parametric modeling features. This software allows different sections of the model to be connected parametrically, so any change in one section automatically updates other related sections. This feature makes Revit much more effective for larger, more complex projects.

Compatibility with Other Software

ArchiCAD:
ArchiCAD is fully compatible with other software and supports a variety of formats, including IFC, DWG, and DXF. It can easily integrate with other BIM and design software such as Rhino and SketchUp.

Revit:
Revit also offers high compatibility with other software, especially Autodesk products such as AutoCAD and 3ds Max. It supports file formats like IFC, DWG, and DXF. One of Revit’s key advantages is its integration with other software within the Autodesk suite, which is very useful for users working in the Autodesk ecosystem.
Features and Capabilities Analysis

Design and Modeling

ArchiCAD:

ArchiCAD has the ability to design complex models with advanced modeling tools and supports parametric modeling. This software allows designers to create precise and complete 3D models and also enables complex interactions between different components and sections of the model. One of ArchiCAD’s unique features is the use of freeform design tools, which allow users to carry out their designs with more precision and flexibility. This feature allows architects and designers to create accurate, complex, and custom designs that require fewer changes or adjustments.

ArchiCAD also offers tools for modeling complex geometric volumes, enabling designers to design and view different parts of the building in a three-dimensional environment simultaneously. Additionally, the GDL (Geometric Description Language) tool enables the creation and use of custom objects, allowing designers to design specific parts and easily add them to BIM models.

Revit:

Revit is highly popular due to its powerful parametric design and modeling capabilities. This software is more focused on modeling structures, installations, and systems, offering highly accurate and advanced design tools. Revit is designed based on parameters, which enables precise and flexible model creation. It allows automatic updates across the model when changes are made to any section, ensuring that design revisions are easily and accurately reflected throughout the project.

Revit provides tools for designing HVAC systems, plumbing, electrical systems, and other building utilities, allowing users to perform highly detailed and complex designs. Since Revit is designed to handle larger and more complex projects, its features in information management, precise modeling, and process simulation make it an excellent tool for commercial and government projects.

One of Revit’s key features is the ability to connect all parts of the model parametricly. This feature not only allows designers to manage architectural and structural models simultaneously but also ensures automatic updates across various project elements, improving accuracy and efficiency in large projects.

Energy Simulation and Building Performance

ArchiCAD:

ArchiCAD vs Revit

When it comes to designing energy-efficient buildings, ArchiCAD vs Revit is a frequent debate among architects and sustainability experts. Both platforms offer robust tools for environmental simulation, but they approach energy performance in different ways. ArchiCAD provides intuitive and integrated tools for simulating energy consumption, daylight analysis, and natural ventilation. It allows users to model how various environmental conditions—such as solar radiation, wind, and temperature—affect building performance. With ArchiCAD, architects can quickly assess how design changes impact energy efficiency and receive suggestions for optimization.

On the other hand, Revit also offers strong energy modeling capabilities, especially when used in combination with Autodesk Insight. Revit focuses on detailed Building Information Modeling (BIM) and integrates with analysis tools to evaluate energy usage, carbon footprint, and thermal comfort. However, ArchiCAD vs Revit in terms of ease of use and native sustainability tools often shows that ArchiCAD has a simpler and more architect-friendly interface for quick analysis.

Ultimately, when comparing ArchiCAD vs Revit, the choice depends on project needs. For projects where energy simulation is a priority from early design stages, ArchiCAD provides a smoother, more focused experience. Yet, both tools support the goal of creating high-performance, sustainable buildings.

Revit:

Revit also offers a wide range of energy simulation and environmental analysis tools, particularly when integrated with powerful add-ons like Autodesk Insight. One of Revit’s key strengths is its ability to model and analyze complex building systems such as HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning), energy consumption, and overall performance. This makes it a top choice for engineers and multidisciplinary teams working on technically demanding projects.

When comparing ArchiCAD vs Revit, it’s clear that Revit excels in system-level modeling, while ArchiCAD offers a more streamlined interface for architects focused on design and sustainability. Revit enables users to model natural airflow, internal temperature changes, and perform detailed calculations related to building energy use. This allows designers to optimize HVAC systems and improve thermal comfort across different zones in a building.

However, in the ArchiCAD vs Revit discussion, ArchiCAD remains strong in early-stage energy analysis, daylight optimization, and ventilation planning. While Revit is highly customizable and data-driven, ArchiCAD often wins when simplicity and design integration are essential.

Overall, the ArchiCAD vs Revit comparison comes down to project priorities—Revit for systems modeling, and ArchiCAD for architectural energy efficiency.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Advantages of ArchiCAD:

  1. Simpler and More User-Friendly Interface:
    One of the biggest advantages of ArchiCAD is its user-friendly interface, which is ideal for architects with less experience in using BIM software. The software is designed with simple and easy-to-understand graphic principles, making it quicker to learn and operate.
  2. Freeform Design Tools:
    ArchiCAD offers significant tools for freeform and creative design. This feature allows designers to create unique and highly detailed models, adjusting and improving their designs with ease.
  3. Stable and Faster Performance:
    ArchiCAD generally performs faster than Revit in terms of data processing and project execution. This is particularly beneficial in small to medium-sized projects where speed is important.

Disadvantages of ArchiCAD:

  1. Limited Parametric Capabilities:
    While ArchiCAD supports parametric modeling, it is not as advanced as Revit in this area. Changes in various parts of the model in ArchiCAD are not automatically reflected across the entire project, requiring more manual intervention.
  2. Less Compatibility with Other BIM Software:
    While ArchiCAD supports various file formats, its compatibility with other BIM software is not as extensive as that of Revit. This can be a limitation in projects that require frequent data exchange with other BIM tools.

Advantages of Revit:

  1. Advanced and Parametric Tools:
    Revit’s biggest advantage lies in its advanced parametric modeling capabilities. The software enables designers to connect all components of the model parametrically, ensuring automatic updates across the project when any part is modified.
  2. Compatibility with Autodesk Software:
    Revit integrates seamlessly with other Autodesk tools such as AutoCAD and 3ds Max. This integration allows for greater project coherence and ensures that designers can benefit from a unified software ecosystem.
  3. High Precision in Systems and Structural Design:
    Revit excels at modeling building systems and structures with high precision. This is particularly beneficial in larger projects that require careful coordination and detailed design of systems and components.

Disadvantages of Revit:

  1. Complex User Interface:
    One of the main drawbacks of Revit is its complex user interface. Beginners may find it challenging to learn and navigate the software, which can result in increased learning time and reduced productivity during the initial stages of use.
  2. Higher Hardware Requirements:
    Revit typically requires more powerful hardware for optimal performance. This can be a challenge for users with older machines, especially when working on larger, more complex projects that demand high processing power.

Conclusion

Both ArchiCAD and Revit offer powerful and advanced tools that are useful for different types of projects. ArchiCAD is better suited for architects with less experience and for small to medium-sized projects where freeform design and user-friendly interfaces are critical. On the other hand, Revit is more efficient for larger and more complex projects, particularly in the areas of parametric design, system modeling, and information management. The choice between these two software solutions ultimately depends on the specific needs of the project and the expertise of the user.

Revolutionizing Construction: 7 Powerful Ways AI and BIM Integration Are Transforming the Industry

Revolutionizing Construction: 7 Powerful Ways AI and BIM Integration Are Transforming the Industry

by ArchitectureArticleBusinessCareerDesignEducationJobProgramsServiceTechnology

Estimated Reading Time: 10 minutes This article presents an in-depth exploration of the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Building Information Modeling (BIM) as a transformative force in the construction industry. It highlights how machine learning algorithms, IoT systems, and generative design are redefining traditional BIM workflows—shifting from static digital modeling to dynamic, predictive, and self-optimizing systems. Key applications include automated clash detection, predictive maintenance, energy efficiency modeling, and real-time construction monitoring using drones and sensors. The paper addresses technical challenges such as data interoperability and workforce upskilling while showcasing global case studies that demonstrate measurable improvements in cost, safety, and operational efficiency. Ultimately, the article argues that AI and BIM integration marks a new paradigm—essential for achieving intelligent infrastructure and competitive advantage in a data-driven construction future.

disclaimer for social media and other platforms instagram youtube facebook llinkedin How CRM Enhances the Trust Quadrant in Your Content Matrix

Disclaimer

by EducationLegalPolicyServiceSocial Media
Estimated Reading Time: 10 minutes

This disclaimer governs the use of content and services provided by Cademix Institute of Technology and entities within the Cademix Group, including its various licenses and associated websites. By accessing and using our platforms, you accept this disclaimer in full. If you disagree with any part of this disclaimer, please refrain from using our website, social media, or communication channels.

Terms and conditions sign contract I agree disclaimer

General Disclaimer for All Content

All content provided by Cademix Institute of Technology and the Cademix Group is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. Users are responsible for their interpretation and use of the information. We do not assume liability for any interpretations or actions based on this content.

Mixed Content Approach

We employ a diverse communication style that may combine educational information, satire, and entertainment within a single post, publication, or presentation. We do not label each piece of content as strictly educational, satirical, or entertaining. Instead, we believe in providing the freedom for followers and viewers to interpret, digest, and perceive the material in a manner most meaningful to them. It is not feasible for us to categorize or quantify individual posts by percentage of educational vs. satirical content. Major social platforms also adapt to this reality through their own fact-check tools, placing responsibility on users to critically evaluate the content.

By default, unless otherwise explicitly stated, our posts and communications are intended to be introductory, engaging, and suitable for social media interaction. Users should not assume that all content is factual or educational. We encourage everyone to verify or cross-check information independently and to seek professional advice for more detailed guidance.

Social Media Content

Instagram

Posts on our Instagram page are created primarily for engagement and entertainment. While some posts may contain educational content, it is ultimately up to the followers or viewers to interpret them. We do not assume responsibility for how this content is perceived. Comments on posts are not actively monitored, and we are not responsible for user-generated content or interactions. Our responses may be automated or managed by our team, but this platform is not intended for primary consultations or professional advice.

Facebook

Our Facebook page provides content for engagement, announcements, and community interaction. The interpretation of posts, including any satirical or fictional elements, is at the discretion of the viewers. Comments and direct messages are not guaranteed a response and may be handled by automated systems or our team. This platform is not intended for in-depth consultations.

Threads (Meta)

Posts on Threads are intended for engagement and conversational purposes. Users are fully responsible for interpreting and applying the information shared. Comments and direct messages are not extensively monitored, and responses may be automated or handled by our team. Like other platforms, Threads is not designed for comprehensive consultations.

LinkedIn

Content on LinkedIn is shared to foster professional networking and engagement. The audience is responsible for interpreting and applying this content as they see fit. Comments and direct messages may not always receive a response and may be managed by automated tools or our team. In-depth or personalized consultations are not conducted through LinkedIn.

YouTube

Videos on our YouTube channel are created for engagement and can include educational material. However, it remains the user’s responsibility to interpret and apply any information provided. Comments are not thoroughly moderated, and any replies may come from automated systems or our staff. YouTube is not intended for in-depth consultations.

Communication Channels

Our communication channels, including WhatsApp, Skype, Microsoft Teams, Zoom, and email, are intended for preliminary discussions or clarifications. These channels may have limitations in scope and clarity. We encourage more detailed voice or video communication for extended consultations.

Email Communication

Email is text-based and can be prone to misunderstandings or missing context. While we welcome email inquiries, we recommend that complex or urgent matters be discussed via voice or video calls to ensure clarity and comprehension.

SMS

SMS messages are limited in content and clarity and are recommended only for initial, brief contact. We encourage users to move to more comprehensive communication methods (voice/video calls, online meetings) when seeking in-depth information or consultation.

Phone Calls

Phone calls are suitable primarily for initial contact or brief discussions. They are not ideal for detailed consultations due to the lack of text or visual references. We encourage users to request an online meeting or video call for more substantial conversations.

Triage and Response Policy

None of our communication channels (social media, messaging platforms, email, or phone) should be considered our primary or official communication channel. As of 2025, we receive several thousand inquiries daily across various platforms, which far exceeds our capacity to handle individually on a complimentary basis. We have therefore implemented a tiered triage system:

  • Unpaid Inquiries: These are addressed based on our available capacity and internal prioritization. There is no set timetable for responses to unpaid inquiries, and some may not receive a direct reply.
  • Paid Clients: We offer different levels of service, including short-term consulting sessions and emergency appointments. These services typically guarantee a response within a defined timeframe (e.g., within a month or a few days for emergencies). However, we do not accept liability for any damages arising from waiting periods.

Comments on social media, particularly if they are deemed low priority or non-urgent, may never be noticed or addressed. Our internal policies allow for immediate blocking or removal of users if their actions compromise the integrity of our community, without prior warning.

Website and Magazine Content

The content available on our websites and in our online or offline magazines is curated and supervised, but may not always be error-free or completely up-to-date. Users are advised to cross-verify any information before making decisions. We are not liable for any direct or indirect losses arising from the use or reliance on such information.

Short-Term Consulting Sessions

Short-term or introductory consulting sessions are intended to provide a preliminary overview or general guidance on a specific topic. These sessions may be recorded (with consent), and their scope is inherently limited by the duration and context provided by the client. We do not assume liability for decisions made based on these sessions.

Long-Term Programs and Contracts

For long-term programs, educational initiatives, or acceleration services, we offer comprehensive support and guidance. Specific contracts are required to govern the scope of services, responsibilities, and liabilities. We assume a higher level of responsibility for these programs, as stipulated in the contract terms.

Language and Translation

Cademix Institute of Technology operates internationally and may use multiple languages (e.g., English, German, Persian). Where legal or official matters are concerned, English is the default language for all contracts and formal agreements. Communication in other languages is for convenience only and should not be considered legally binding.

Conclusion

We encourage all users and participants to seek professional advice for specific, detailed inquiries. This disclaimer is designed to clarify the scope and nature of our content, communications, and services. If you have any questions about this disclaimer or require further information, please contact us through our official channels.

This disclaimer is subject to change without prior notice. We recommend reviewing it periodically to stay informed about our policies and procedures.

Haftungsausschluss | Disclaimer, Deutsche Version

Einleitung

Dieser Haftungsausschluss regelt die Nutzung von Inhalten und Dienstleistungen, die vom Cademix Institute of Technology (im Folgenden „Cademix“) sowie von zur Cademix Group gehörenden Unternehmen oder Lizenzen, einschließlich aller zugehörigen Websites, bereitgestellt werden. Durch den Zugriff auf unsere Plattformen und deren Nutzung erklären Sie sich mit diesem Haftungsausschluss in vollem Umfang einverstanden. Sollten Sie mit einem Teil dieses Haftungsausschlusses nicht einverstanden sein, sehen Sie bitte von der Nutzung unserer Website, Social-Media-Kanäle oder Kommunikationswege ab.

Allgemeiner Haftungsausschluss für sämtliche Inhalte

Alle von Cademix und der Cademix Group zur Verfügung gestellten Inhalte dienen ausschließlich Informations- und Unterhaltungszwecken. Die Verantwortung für die Auslegung und Verwendung dieser Informationen liegt bei den Nutzern. Wir übernehmen keinerlei Haftung für etwaige Interpretationen oder Handlungen, die auf Grundlage dieser Inhalte erfolgen.

Mischform von Inhalten

Wir verwenden vielfältige Kommunikationsstile, die in einzelnen Beiträgen, Publikationen oder Präsentationen sowohl Bildungsinhalte als auch satirische und unterhaltende Elemente enthalten können. Wir kategorisieren unsere Inhalte nicht einzeln als „rein informativ“, „satirisch“ oder „unterhaltsam“. Stattdessen räumen wir den Followern und Zuschauern die Freiheit ein, das jeweilige Material nach ihrem eigenen Verständnis wahrzunehmen und zu bewerten. Da es praktisch nicht möglich ist, einzelne Beiträge prozentual in „Bildung“ oder „Satire“ einzuordnen, liegt die kritische Bewertung dieser Inhalte in der Verantwortung der Nutzer. Große Social-Media-Plattformen unterstützen diesen Ansatz ebenfalls durch eigene „Faktenchecks“, sodass die Nutzer selbst zur kritischen Prüfung angehalten werden.

Sofern nicht ausdrücklich anders vermerkt, sind unsere Beiträge und Kommunikationen standardmäßig als kurze Einführungen, Interaktionen und für soziale Medien geeignete Formate vorgesehen. Nutzer sollten nicht davon ausgehen, dass sämtliche Inhalte faktisch korrekt oder ausschließlich zu Bildungszwecken konzipiert sind. Wir empfehlen dringend, alle Informationen eigenständig zu überprüfen und bei Bedarf professionellen Rat einzuholen.

Inhalte in sozialen Medien

Instagram

Die auf unserem Instagram-Kanal geteilten Beiträge dienen in erster Linie der Interaktion und Unterhaltung. Obwohl manche Inhalte einen Bildungsaspekt beinhalten können, obliegt deren Auslegung vollumfänglich den Followern bzw. Betrachtern. Wir übernehmen keine Verantwortung für individuelle Interpretationen dieser Beiträge. Kommentare werden nicht aktiv moderiert, und wir haften nicht für nutzergenerierte Inhalte oder Interaktionen. Unsere Antworten können automatisiert oder durch unser Team erfolgen. Diese Plattform ist nicht für professionelle Beratungen oder ausführliche Konsultationen vorgesehen.

Facebook

Unser Facebook-Auftritt dient primär der Interaktion, Bekanntmachung von Neuigkeiten sowie der Einbindung einer Community. Die Deutung der Beiträge – einschließlich satirischer oder fiktionaler Elemente – liegt im Ermessen der Nutzer. Wir geben keine Garantie für eine Antwort auf Kommentare oder Direktnachrichten; diese können automatisiert oder durch unser Team bearbeitet werden. Diese Plattform ist für tiefergehende oder fachspezifische Beratungen nicht ausgelegt.

Threads (Meta)

Unsere Veröffentlichungen in Threads (Meta) zielen auf Interaktion und Austausch ab. Die Nutzer sind selbst dafür verantwortlich, wie sie die bereitgestellten Informationen interpretieren und nutzen. Kommentare und Direktnachrichten werden nicht durchgängig moderiert; Antworten können automatisiert oder durch unser Team erfolgen. Threads ist – ebenso wie andere Plattformen – nicht für umfassende Fachberatungen vorgesehen.

LinkedIn

Unsere Inhalte auf LinkedIn fördern in erster Linie den professionellen Austausch und das Networking. Die Interpretation und Anwendung dieser Beiträge liegt im Einflussbereich der Nutzer. Wir übernehmen keine Gewährleistung, dass alle Kommentare und Direktnachrichten beantwortet werden; unter Umständen erfolgen Antworten automatisiert oder durch unser Team. Persönliche, ausführliche Konsultationen werden nicht über LinkedIn abgewickelt.

YouTube

Die Videos auf unserem YouTube-Kanal werden zur Interaktion und gegebenenfalls zu Bildungszwecken veröffentlicht. Dennoch liegt die Verantwortung für das Verständnis und die Umsetzung der Inhalte bei den Nutzern. Kommentare werden nicht durchgehend moderiert; Antworten können automatisiert oder durch unser Team erfolgen. YouTube ist nicht für tiefergehende Beratungen geeignet.

Kommunikationskanäle

Unsere Kommunikationskanäle – darunter WhatsApp, Skype, Microsoft Teams, Zoom und E-Mail – sind für erste Anfragen oder kurze Erläuterungen vorgesehen. Diese Kanäle können in ihrem Umfang und ihrer Klarheit eingeschränkt sein. Für weiterführende Gespräche oder spezifische Beratungsleistungen empfehlen wir ausdrücklich erweiterte Audio- oder Videogespräche.

E-Mail-Kommunikation

Die E-Mail-Kommunikation ist textbasiert und kann zu Missverständnissen oder unvollständigen Informationen führen. Für komplexe oder dringliche Angelegenheiten raten wir deshalb zu Audio- oder Videogesprächen, um Unklarheiten besser ausräumen zu können.

SMS

SMS-Nachrichten sind in Inhalt und Umfang eingeschränkt und sollten daher nur für kurze Erstkontakte eingesetzt werden. Für detaillierte Informationen oder Beratungen empfehlen wir ausdrucksstärkere Kommunikationsmethoden (z. B. Audio-/Videogespräche, Online-Meetings).

Telefonate

Telefonische Kontakte sind in erster Linie für kurze Einstiegs- oder Klärungsgespräche gedacht. Für ausführliche Beratungen sind Telefonate ungeeignet, da weder Text- noch Bildinformationen zur Verfügung stehen. Wir empfehlen daher, für komplexere Fragestellungen Online- oder Videokonferenzen zu vereinbaren.

Prioritäts- und Antwortpolitik

Keiner unserer Kommunikationskanäle (soziale Medien, Messenger-Dienste, E-Mail oder Telefon) ist als primärer oder offizieller Kommunikationsweg anzusehen. Seit 2025 erreichen uns täglich mehrere tausend Anfragen auf verschiedenen Plattformen, was unsere Kapazitäten für eine kostenfreie Bearbeitung im Einzelfall übersteigt. Aus diesem Grund haben wir ein mehrstufiges Prioritätssystem eingeführt:

  • Unbezahlte Anfragen (Unpaid Inquiries): Diese werden nach verfügbarer Kapazität und interner Priorisierung bearbeitet. Es besteht keinerlei Frist für eine mögliche Beantwortung; einige Anfragen bleiben womöglich unbeantwortet.
  • Bezahlte Kunden (Paid Clients): Wir bieten unterschiedliche Servicestufen, darunter Kurzzeit-Beratungen oder Notfalltermine. Diese Dienstleistungen beinhalten in der Regel feste Antwortzeiten (z. B. innerhalb eines Monats oder weniger Tage bei Notfällen). Wir haften jedoch nicht für Schäden, die durch eventuelle Wartezeiten entstehen könnten.

Insbesondere Kommentare in sozialen Netzwerken, die als weniger dringlich oder nachrangig eingestuft werden, können unter Umständen nie gelesen oder beantwortet werden. Um die Integrität unserer Community zu wahren, behalten wir uns das Recht vor, Benutzer ohne Vorwarnung zu blockieren oder zu entfernen.

Inhalte auf Websites und in Magazinen

Die Inhalte, die auf unseren Websites oder in unseren Online- bzw. Print-Magazinen veröffentlicht werden, unterliegen einer gewissen Kontrolle, sind aber möglicherweise nicht fehlerfrei oder vollständig aktualisiert. Nutzer sollten alle Informationen eigenständig prüfen und bewerten, bevor sie Entscheidungen treffen. Jegliche Haftung für direkte oder indirekte Schäden, die durch die Verwendung oder das Vertrauen auf diese Informationen entstehen, wird ausgeschlossen.

Kurzzeitige Beratungssitzungen

Kurzzeitige oder erste Beratungssitzungen sollen eine vorläufige Übersicht oder allgemeine Orientierung zu einem bestimmten Thema liefern. Solche Sitzungen können mit Zustimmung aller Beteiligten aufgezeichnet werden; ihr Umfang ist jedoch durch die zur Verfügung stehende Zeit und die gegebenen Informationen begrenzt. Wir übernehmen keine Verantwortung für Entscheidungen, die auf Basis dieser Sitzungen getroffen werden.

Langfristige Programme und Verträge

Bei langfristigen Programmen, Bildungsangeboten oder Accelerator-Services bieten wir umfassende Betreuung und Anleitung. Hierzu sind spezifische Verträge erforderlich, in denen Leistungsumfang, Verantwortlichkeiten und Haftung festgelegt sind. Wir übernehmen in diesen Programmen eine erweiterte Verantwortung, wie sie in den jeweiligen Vertragsbedingungen definiert ist.

Sprache und Übersetzung

Das Cademix Institute of Technology ist international tätig und kann mehrere Sprachen (z. B. Englisch, Deutsch, Persisch) verwenden. In rechtlichen und offiziellen Angelegenheiten gilt Englisch als maßgebliche Sprache für Verträge und Vereinbarungen. Die Kommunikation in anderen Sprachen dient lediglich der Erleichterung des Austauschs und entfaltet keine rechtliche Verbindlichkeit.

Fazit

Wir empfehlen allen Nutzern und Interessenten ausdrücklich, bei konkreten Fragestellungen oder spezialisierten Beratungsbedürfnissen professionellen Rat einzuholen. Dieser Haftungsausschluss dient der Klarstellung des Umfangs und Charakters unserer Inhalte, Kommunikationskanäle sowie Dienstleistungen. Sollten Sie Fragen zu diesem Haftungsausschluss haben oder weitere Informationen benötigen, kontaktieren Sie uns bitte über unsere offiziellen Kanäle.

Dieser Haftungsausschluss kann ohne vorherige Ankündigung geändert werden. Es wird empfohlen, ihn in regelmäßigen Abständen zu überprüfen, um über mögliche Aktualisierungen unserer Richtlinien und Verfahren informiert zu bleiben.